Patrick Holden's Take: EAT-Lancet 2.0 Report Analysis
PermaNews Brief
Key Takeaways
Patrick Holden critically evaluates the EAT-Lancet 2.0 report, highlighting its limitations for sustainable agriculture and food systems.
- EAT-Lancet report overlooks integrated farming benefits.
- Report focuses narrowly on diet, not food production.
- Sustainable food systems need diverse, context-specific approaches.
- Policy recommendations should support mixed farming.
- Biodiversity and soil health are crucial omissions.
Why It Matters
The EAT-Lancet 2.0 report, despite its influence, could misguide agricultural policy by promoting an overly simplistic view of sustainable food systems, potentially harming biodiversity and local economies.
What to Do Next
Research local, regenerative farms in your area and consider supporting their diverse agricultural practices.
Recommended for: Anyone interested in the critical perspective on global food policy and its implications for sustainable farming and food systems.
The post Patrick Holden responds to the EAT-Lancet 2.0 report appeared first on Sustainable Food Trust.
Source: sustainablefoodtrust.org
Related Analysis
- Global Water Bankruptcy Forces Agricultural Adaptation — UN report reveals water bankruptcy across surface waters, glaciers, and groundwater, forcing immediate agricultural adap…
Related on PermaNews
- Federal Policy Shift: Native Regenerative Ag for Soil & Carbon (Article)
- Building Resilient Soils: Planning & Resources for Extreme Weather Events (Event)
- Navigating Global Water Bankruptcy: A UN Call for Agricultural Change (Article)
- Leveraging Agroecology and Regenerative Agriculture (Video)
- More Than Food: The Social Benefits of Localized Urban Agriculture (Article)
- Strengthening Community Health through Regenerative Food Systems (Case Study)
Explore more in Food Systems & Growing — the full hub for this knowledge area.